Rare Book Monthly

Articles - November - 2014 Issue

How Can Collectors Save $14 Million on Their Estate Taxes?

Well, for starters, you better begin with a lot of money. A recently decided appeals court case has been labeled a major victory for wealthy collectors with regards to reducing their estate tax liability. A $14 million judgment against the IRS can elicit a giddy response. Nonetheless, we recommend a dose of caution be taken by those who may see this as a slam dunk for high end collectors. Not everything is quite so cut and dried, and every estate is unique.

 

This notable case involved works of art, but there is no reason why it would not apply to books or other valuable collections. Lawyers, and we should all be thankful for lawyers, have found many ways for people of means to legally avoid part of their tax liability. If you have enough money to be subject to significant estate tax liability, you likely have sought out professional advice already, but if not, and you own valuable “collectibles,” here is a case of which you should be aware. But, please do not make any decisions based on this brief review. Seek professional help now!

 

James A. Elkins, Jr., died in 2006. His wife predeceased him. He was a very wealthy man. Mr. Elkins also had access to the best legal advice. His father was a founder of Vinson & Elkins, a law firm based in Houston but with offices all over the world. It is one of the nation's most prestigious law firms. Mr. Elkins was also an art collector, owning a few very valuable pieces of art, and many others of significant, though more modest value. Many pieces were hanging from the walls of his Houston home.

 

At this point we should note two of the ways you can reduce the amount of estate tax you owe. Mr. Elkins used both. One is to transfer some of that estate to others before you die. The other is to show why the assets in your estate are worth less than people might think. The lower the value of your estate, the less it will have to pay in taxes when you die.

 

In 1990, Mr. Elkins created a trust that effectively gave his 50% interest in three very valuable works to his children. Texas is a community property state, which means that (for the most part) each spouse owns a 50% share of the couple's property. When Mrs. Elkins died, he got back her 50%, but he did something else with her 50% share of the other 61 pieces of art. Those 61 would have gone to Mr. Elkins, and he would not have paid any estate tax. Transfers to your spouse on death are not subject to estate tax, but transfers to anyone else are. However, all of the value of those 61 pieces of art would have been subject to tax later when Mr. Elkins died.

 

Now, there is an exemption from estate tax for a significant amount of money. This is why the average person's estate is not subject to tax. Currently, that amount is a little over $5 million, though it was considerably less when Mrs. Elkins died in 2000. Nonetheless, Mrs. Elkins' exemption was about to be wasted. So, Mr. Elkins declined his wife's bequest of a portion of her 50% interest in those other 61 works of art, allowing it to go the secondary heirs, their children, instead. He declined just enough to fully use up her estate tax exemption, but not enough to generate any tax liability. This way, there would be less in his estate to tax when he died. The result was that each of his three children immediately received an 8.98167% interest in each of the 61 pieces of art. Yes, we are serious about that share percentage.

 

Now, you may wonder why Mr. Elkins didn't just give each child a couple of paintings until enough was given to reach the exemption threshold. The reason is that Mr. Elkins, or his lawyers, were way too savvy for that. They were creating something called a “fractional ownership” in each piece, and eventually, this would end up saving the kids $14 million. This is why, if you are wealthy, you need a good tax lawyer.

 

The parties (father and children) then did a few more things. They signed an agreement saying none of them could sell their fractional interests in the art without the consent of all of the others. They also created the terms of how they would “share” the art. Each party was entitled to hang the art on their wall for a percentage of the year based on their percentage of ownership. To exercise this right, they had to give the current possessor 30 days notice and pay all expenses in moving the art. So, one of the offspring could possess these items for 33 days per year, providing he/she wanted to pay the expenses involved in moving 64 pieces of valuable artwork. Not surprisingly, and to keep this an “arm's length” transaction, the children all agreed to lease their 33 days worth back to their father so they could remain on his wall.

 

Now if all this sounds like insanity, there is a reason for this madness. Its name is “fractional share discount.” It is a concept widely known among the very wealthy and their lawyers, though perhaps not by most others. It applies to all sorts of things – real estate, a family business, and art. What it says, in effect, is that the sum of the parts aren't worth as much as the whole. Here is how it works. Items in an estate are valued for tax purposes based on the market value – the price a free and independent buyer and seller would exchange to buy or sell the item. To determine the fair market value, the estate hired an appraiser from Sotheby's. Independent transactions take place at Sotheby's practically everyday. All parties, including the IRS, agreed his values were fair.

 

Now, here is where the fractional discount comes into play. Say one of these paintings was fairly valued at $10 million. What is an 8.98167% share of it worth? Did you say $898,167? Guess again. Courts have regularly said no. It is less. What can you do with this fractional share? You have no real control over the art. If you bought it, you would have to deal with the co-owners. Ideally, you would all get together to sell your interests jointly, so that the painting could be sold for the $10 million it is worth. However, one of the children testified that all three of them so liked these works, and they had such deep sentimental value, that there was no way they would ever part with their shares. On top of that, there was an agreement requiring all owners agree to a sale, each one having a veto power. Anyone buying a fractional share would have their money tied up, and no practical way to sell what they had purchased. And, if the fractional owner wanted to hang the art on his walls, the cost of yearly shipping for limited use would be prohibitive. Naturally, those shares are worth far less than $898,167 in the open market. The estate's appraiser said 50% - 80% less. That in turn means the estate is worth less and the estate tax it must pay is less.

 

Think about it. No art dealer is going to agree to sell such an interest in their gallery. One of the estate's witnesses testified that no auction house would sell such a fractional interest either. This is why the estate's valuation expert witness testified that the market value of the artworks, because of these fractional ownerships, was 50% - 80% less than it would be if held by a single owner.

 

The estate next brought in a legal expert who estimated the cost of legal help to go to court to try to force a sale because of the divided ownership. He estimated that would cost a ton of money, and for most of the works, the cost of forcing a sale was more than the value of the pieces themselves.

 

The IRS put all its eggs in one basket, a decision that turned out to be a mistake. It argued against the concept of a fractional share discount. Their argument, in a sense borrowed from the estate's claim, was that there was no recognizable market for fractional shares, since they never come up for sale at auction or elsewhere. Therefore, it reasoned, the standard valuation, as presented by the Sotheby's expert, should prevail, but with no discount for the ownership being divided. The first court to hear the case, the U.S. Tax Court, disagreed, and upheld the legitimacy of fractional share discounts. However, it then threw the Elkins' daughter's testimony back at the estate. She had testified how the children would never part with the artwork. The court took that perhaps a bit more seriously then the estate would have liked. They concluded that, if the children loved the art so much, they would pay up to be able to fully control it, and prevent the possibility of an outside fractional owner forcing a sale. Therefore, the Tax Court concluded the estate was only entitled to a 10% discount for the ownership being divided, rather than the 50% - 80% their expert had testified.

 

The Elkins' estate appealed the Tax Court's ruling to the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, and it is their ruling that has tax lawyers abuzz. The Appeals Court overturned the Tax Court decision. It upheld the part about fractional share discounts being legitimate, but overturned the 10% amount. Instead, it opted for the far greater discounts proposed by the estate.

 

While the Appeals Court felt the large discounts sought by the estate were “eminently correct,” which should hearten wealthy collectors and their lawyers, that wasn't the reason behind the reversal. They concluded that a legal case must be determined by the evidence presented. There was no evidence to support the 10% discount – the Tax Court just made that figure up based on its own beliefs of what is reasonable. The only evidence of value presented was that provided by the estate. The IRS, relying entirely on having the concept of fractional discount rejected, gave no evidence of what it believed a correct fractional discount would be. The estate's evidence of an appropriate discount went unrefuted. Since it was not, in the Appeals Court's eyes, an unreasonable amount, the Court concluded it had no choice but to accept the estate's conclusion. Slam dunk? For the Elkins' estate yes, but for the next case, not so fast.

 

Next time, the IRS can be expected to present its own estimate of a fair fractional discount, and it is likely to be less than 50% - 80%. It is unlikely the next estate will get a free pass. The Fifth Circuit Appeals Court may have found the discount “eminently correct,” but perhaps they would have been less certain if a reasonable contrary opinion were raised. Besides which, these cases are usually heard in Tax Court first. These judges deal with nothing but tax cases, and perhaps have a more jaundiced eye towards lawyerly schemes. Certainly, there was no purpose to this bizarre, convoluted transaction other than to reduce taxes. Courts tend to prefer a transaction have some legitimate other purpose. So, while there is nothing to lose and at least something to gain from sharing ownership of valuable collectibles with your heirs, you should not assume the discounts will always be quite so large. Maybe they will, and maybe they won't.

 

This case really should have been brought before Judge Judy. She would have had a more commonsense solution, like the one King Solomon applied so many years ago. If they don't want to pay their taxes, let the kids hang their 8.98167% of each painting on the wall.


Posted On: 2014-11-18 21:30
User Name: Fattrad1

Bruce,

You just wasted a lot of your readership's time. As you noted, the next cases before the IRS and the tax court will have additional evidence presented and tried differently. This article, while interesting, was a waste of bandwidth.

Jeff Elfont CPA
Swan's Fine Books


Rare Book Monthly

  • Potter & Potter Auctions
    How History Unfolds on Paper:
    Choice Selections from the Eric C. Caren Collection
    Part IX
    April 18, 2024
    Potter & Potter, Apr. 18: [RUTH, George Herman “Babe” (1895-1948)]. Signed photograph. Circa 1930s. 191 x 248 mm. $1,500 to $2,500.
    Potter & Potter, Apr. 18: HARRISON, Benjamin. Document signed (“Benj Harrison”) as governor of Virginia, certifying the service of Daniel Cumbo, a Black Revolutionary soldier. $6,000 to $9,000.
    Potter & Potter, Apr. 18: ONE OF THE FIRST PRINTED ANNOUNCEMENTS OF THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE. $4,000 to $6,000.
    Potter & Potter Auctions
    How History Unfolds on Paper:
    Choice Selections from the Eric C. Caren Collection
    Part IX
    April 18, 2024
    Potter & Potter, Apr. 18: FIRST PRINTING OF LINCOLN’S IMMORTAL GETTYSBURG ADDRESS. $4,000 to $6,000.
    Potter & Potter, Apr. 18: HIGHLY IMPORTANT MORMON ARCHIVE. ALLEY, George. Archive of 23 Autograph Letters Signed by Mormon Convert George Alley to His Brother Joseph Alley. $10,000 to $20,000.
    Potter & Potter, Apr. 18: [AVIATION]. [ARMSTRONG, Neil A.] Aviation Hall of Fame Gold Medal MS64 NGC, Awarded to Neil Armstrong in 1979. $2,000 to $3,000.
    Potter & Potter Auctions
    How History Unfolds on Paper:
    Choice Selections from the Eric C. Caren Collection
    Part IX
    April 18, 2024
    Potter & Potter, Apr. 18: NEWLY DISCOVERED FIRST PRINTING OF "WITH MALICE TOWARDS NONE... " FROM THE ONLY NEWSPAPER ACTUALLY ALLOWED TO PARTICIPATE IN LINCOLN’S SECOND INAUGURAL PROCESSION. $4,000 to $8,000.
    Potter & Potter, Apr. 18: THE MOST IMPORTANT GEORGE WASHINGTON DOCUMENT IN PRIVATE HANDS; GEORGE WASHINGTON’S COMMISSION AS COMMANDER IN CHIEF, 1775, ONE OF ONLY TWO ORIGINALS. $150,000 to $250,000.
    Potter & Potter, Apr. 18: A VERY RARE ACCOUNT OF BLACKBEARD’S DEATH AND ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT PIRATE ITEMS EXTANT. $3,000 to $5,000.
    Potter & Potter Auctions
    How History Unfolds on Paper:
    Choice Selections from the Eric C. Caren Collection
    Part IX
    April 18, 2024
    Potter & Potter, Apr. 18: EDISON, Thomas. Patent for Edison’s Improvements on the Electric-Light, No. 219,628. [Washington, D.C.: U.S. Patent Office], 16 September 1879. $2,000 to $3,000.
    Potter & Potter, Apr. 18: [VIETNAM WAR]. The original pen used by Secretary of State William P. Rogers to sign the Vietnam Peace Agreement, Paris, 27 January 1973. $10,000 to $15,000.
    Potter & Potter, Apr. 18: SONS OF LIBERTY FOUNDER COLONEL BARRÉ ANNOTATED TITLE-PAGE, “WHICH OUGHT TO ROUSE UP BRITISH ATTENTION”. $4,000 to $6,000.
  • Forum Auctions
    Books, Manuscripts and Works on Paper
    28th March 2024
    Forum Mar. 28: [Langland (William)]. The vision of Pierce Plowman, nowe the seconde time imprinted..., Roberte Crowley, 1550. £8,000 to £10,000.
    Forum Mar. 28: [Shakespeare (William)]. [Comedies, Histories, and Tragedies], second folio edition, [by Tho.Cotes, for Robert Allot], [1632]. £30,000 to £40,000.
    Forum Mar. 28: Bible, Czech Biblia Bohemica, first complete Bible printed in the Czech vernacular, Prague, August 1488. £30,000 to £40,000.
    Forum Auctions
    Books, Manuscripts and Works on Paper
    28th March 2024
    Forum Mar. 28: Shabthai Tzvi.- Collection of four printed and illustrated broadsides detailing the appearance, rise and fall of the false messiah, Shabthai Tzvi, Augsburg, 1666-67. £40,000 to £60,000.
    Forum Mar. 28: Leaf from the Beauvais Missal, in Latin, illuminated manuscript on parchment, [Northern France (perhaps Beauvais or Amiens)], [fourteenth century (c.1310)]. £4,000 to £6,000.
    Forum Mar. 28: Aubrey (John). [Remaines of Gentilisme and Judaisme], manuscript in English, Latin and Greek, [c. 1693]. £30,000 to £50,000.
    Forum Auctions
    Books, Manuscripts and Works on Paper
    28th March 2024
    Forum Mar. 28: Byron (George Gordon Noel, Lord). Poems on Various Occasions, first edition, Harriet Maltby's copy, Newark, Printed by S. & J. Ridge, 1807. £30,000 to £40,000.
    Forum Mar. 28: Tolkien (J.R.R.) The Hobbit, first edition, second impression with dust-jacket, 1937 [but 1938]. £7,000 to £10,000.
    Forum Mar. 28: Blake (William).- Thornton (Robert John). The Pastorals of Virgil, 2 vol., engraved plates by William Blake, 1821. £8,000 to £12,000.
    Forum Auctions
    Books, Manuscripts and Works on Paper
    28th March 2024
    Forum Mar. 28: America.- Mount (William J.) & Thomas Page. The English Pilot…, [bound with] The Fourth Book, describing The West Indies Navigation from Hudson's-Bay to the River Amazones, 1721. £20,000 to £30,000.
    Forum Mar. 28: Oldfield (Henry Ambrose), Rajman Singh Chitrakar & others. An album of 160 photographs and 13 original artworks, (1833-1919), [c. 1850s-1880s]. £20,000 to £30,000.
    Forum Mar. 28: Audubon (John James) [and William MacGillivray]. Ornithological Biography…, 5 vol., first edition, presentation copy inscribed by Audubon, Edinburgh, 1831-49 [i.e. 1831-39]. £10,000 to £15,000.
  • Sotheby’s
    Modern First Editions
    Available for Immediate Purchase
    Sotheby’s, Available Now: Winston Churchill. The Second World War. Set of First-Edition Volumes. 6,000 USD
    Sotheby’s, Available Now: A.A. Milne, Ernest H. Shepard. A Collection of The Pooh Books. Set of First-Editions. 18,600 USD
    Sotheby’s, Available Now: Salvador Dalí, Lewis Carroll. Alice's Adventures in Wonderland. Finely Bound and Signed Limited Edition. 15,000 USD
    Sotheby’s
    Modern First Editions
    Available for Immediate Purchase
    Sotheby’s, Available Now: Ian Fleming. Live and Let Die. First Edition. 9,500 USD
    Sotheby’s, Available Now: J.K. Rowling. Harry Potter Series. Finely Bound First Printing Set of Complete Series. 5,650 USD
    Sotheby’s, Available Now: Ernest Hemingway. A Farewell to Arms. First Edition, First Printing. 4,200 USD
  • Bonhams, Mar. 22 – Apr. 2: A RUTH BADER GINSBURG BEADED JUDICIAL COLLAR. $80,000 - $120,000
    Bonhams, Mar. 22 – Apr. 2: ONLY KNOWN COPY OF THE ONLY BOOK BY THE REMARKABLE EVE ADAMS. $8,000 - $12,000
    Bonhams, Mar. 22 – Apr. 2: A COMPLETE RUN OF VISIONAIRE MAGAZINE THROUGH 2010. $6,000 - $9,000
    Bonhams, Mar. 22 – Apr. 2: LAW REVIEW OFFPRINT SIGNED AND INSCRIBED BY RUTH BADER GINSBURG. $3,000 - $5,000
    Bonhams, Mar. 22 – Apr. 2: META REBNER'S WORKING SCRIPT OF THE LOVED ONE. $1,500 - $2,000
    Bonhams, Mar. 22 – Apr. 2: A KATHY GROVE PORTRAIT OF CYNDI LAUPER FOR THE FEBRUARY 1989 DETAILS COVER. $800 - $1,200
    Bonhams, Mar. 22 – Apr. 2: A PLASTIC COAT BY MILLIE DAVID FEATURED IN SOHO NEWS STYLE SECTION, FROM THE COLLECTION OF ANNIE FLANDERS. $500 - $700
    Bonhams, Mar. 22 – Apr. 2: A RUTH BADER GINSBURG JEWELRY BOX. $600 - $900
    Bonhams, Mar. 22 – Apr. 2: A SET OF JONI MITCHELL LYRICS FOR "IF I HAD A HEART." $2,000 - $3,000
  • 19th Century Shop
    Catalogue 198 just published
    19th Century Shop. Darwin and Wallace, first printing of the first paper on natural selection
    19th Century Shop. Shakespeare’s Poems, first collected edition
    19th Century Shop. Walt Whitman portrait inscribed with a Leaves of Grass poem
    19th Century Shop. Major Elizabeth Barrett Browning manuscript notebook
    19th Century Shop. Spock's Baby Book, original MS
    19th Century Shop. Cellarius, Harmonia Macrocosmica, the great celestial atlas

Article Search

Archived Articles

Ask Questions